Ambivalent Ambition

Today’s PSA.

alexandraerin:

If you talk about racism and don’t take time to specify that not all white people participate in a particular act, you’re just as dishonest as the meteorologist who refuses to report all the weather that isn’t happening, the mugging victim who doesn’t point out all the people who haven’t robbed them, or the activist who accuses the police of firing on an unarmed man ninety-seven times but doesn’t give an equal focus to all the bullets that missed.

I love this.

longhorse:

coelasquid:

How media clearly reflects the sexism and the racism we cannot see in ourselves.

I wanted my first-year film students to understand what happens to a story when actual human beings inhabit your characters, and the way they can inspire storytelling. And I wanted to teach them how to look at headshots and what you might be able to tell from a headshot. So for the past few years I’ve done a small experiment with them.

Some troubling shit always occurs.

It works like this: I bring in my giant file of head shots, which include actors of all races, sizes, shapes, ages, and experience levels. Each student picks a head shot from the stack and gets a few minutes to sit with the person’s face and then make up a little story about them. 

Namely, for white men, they have no trouble coming up with an entire history, job, role, genre, time, place, and costume. They will often identify him without prompting as “the main character.” The only exception? “He would play the gay guy.” For white women, they mostly do not come up with a job (even though it was specifically asked for), and they will identify her by her relationships. “She would play the mom/wife/love interest/best friend.” I’ve heard “She would play the slut” or “She would play the hot girl.” A lot more than once.

For nonwhite men, it can be equally depressing. “He’s in a buddy cop movie, but he’s not the main guy, he’s the partner.” “He’d play a terrorist.” “He’d play a drug dealer.” “A thug.” “A hustler.” “Homeless guy.” One Asian actor was promoted to “villain.”

For nonwhite women (grab onto something sturdy, like a big glass of strong liquor), sometimes they are “lucky” enough to be classified as the girlfriend/love interest/mom, but I have also heard things like “Well, she’d be in a romantic comedy, but as the friend, you know?” “Maid.” “Prostitute.” “Drug addict.”

I should point out that the responses are similar whether the group is all or mostly-white or extremely racially mixed, and all the groups I’ve tried this with have been about equally balanced between men and women, though individual responses vary. Women do a little better with women, and people of color do a little better with people of color, but female students sometimes forget to come up with a job for female actors and black male students sometimes tell the class that their black male actor wouldn’t be the main guy.

Once the students have made their pitches, we interrogate their opinions. “You seem really sure that he’s not the main character – why? What made you automatically say that?” “You said she was a mom. Was she born a mom, or did she maybe do something else with her life before her magic womb opened up and gave her an identity? Who is she as a person?” In the case of the “thug“, it turns out that the student was just reading off his film resume. This brilliant African American actor who regularly brings houses down doing Shakespeare on the stage and more than once made me weep at the beauty and subtlety of his performances, had a list of film credits that just said “Thug #4.” “Gang member.” “Muscle.” Because that’s the film work he can get. Because it puts food on his table.

So, the first time I did this exercise, I didn’t know that it would turn into a lesson on racism, sexism, and every other kind of -ism. I thought it was just about casting. But now I know that casting is never just about casting, and this day is a real teachable opportunity. Because if we do this right, we get to the really awkward silence, where the (now mortified) students try to sink into their chairs. Because, hey, most of them are proud Obama voters! They have been raised by feminist moms! They don’t want to be or see themselves as being racist or sexist. But their own racism and sexism is running amok in the room, and it’s awkward.

I think this is really an important thing for people to read and consider. All too often I’ll point out something that struck me as odd, like, say, realize halfway through an otherwise enjoyable movie that all of the villains seem to be minorities or the only people dying seem to be women or something like that; only to have the people I’m talking to get irritated and snap back with “Oh yeah, I’m completely sure the film makers are totally Neo-Nazis just using this movie as a vehicle to further their agenda”.

Okay, of course I don’t think the film makers are secretly smouldering bigots trying to keep the little guy down, the problem is that they’re wired in such a way that nobody stepped back and looked at the story they were making and though “huh. maybe we’re kinda diving into bad stereotype territory here. Perhaps we should find another way to handle this character/plot development”.

This is like an offshoot of that whole problem where many people will read a story or script and default their mental image of the characters to white males unless other details are explicitly stated. It’s not a conscious thing people are actively trying to impose, it’s just become so deeply ingrained that it doesn’t occur to creators that there’s a box they’re allowed to think outside of. And that’s where the problem is.

Obviously this isn’t the kind of thing that’s going to go away overnight, but if you’re lucky enough to be a creator in a situation where you don’t need to design by committee and appease a board of investors by convincing them that your core cast is “normal” enough not to alienate your middle class suburban American audience, keep this in mind. You’re in the best position to go trailblazing.

Ugh, I hate getting the  ”what, you think the artist is racist/sexist/homophobic?” reply. No, I don’t, I just think they haven’t thought about it, and that kind of reaction protects anyone from having to think about it.

(Source: letthetruthlaugh)